Hey guys, so this is something I've been thinking about lately.
There are two types of gaff decks: The "Ellusionist" decks, where the cards are actually specially printed cards that have a different graphic than normal cards.
There are also gaffed cards where the spectator never knows that the card is being used. An example would be a double backer or a split face. These allow you to do things not possible with normal cards, but never show the actual gaffed card to the spectator.
My question to you is, which is better (in your opinion)? One one hand, you have a card that lets you do the impossible, but it is never known. On the other hand, you have a card that is visually changed in some way, but the spectator then knows that you can get cards specially printed, which in my opinion ruins the magic.
In the words of Mitchell, discuss...
David
There are two types of gaff decks: The "Ellusionist" decks, where the cards are actually specially printed cards that have a different graphic than normal cards.
There are also gaffed cards where the spectator never knows that the card is being used. An example would be a double backer or a split face. These allow you to do things not possible with normal cards, but never show the actual gaffed card to the spectator.
My question to you is, which is better (in your opinion)? One one hand, you have a card that lets you do the impossible, but it is never known. On the other hand, you have a card that is visually changed in some way, but the spectator then knows that you can get cards specially printed, which in my opinion ruins the magic.
In the words of Mitchell, discuss...
David