Duct Taped guessing game, any ideas?

Jan 11, 2011
156
0
Hi guys!

I was playing with this new routine recently, where I'm duct taped, and do some guessing. But I think there's still something missing in it. I need to make it more emotionally engaging. Would you have any ideas, what could I add to it?

Here's the video:

[video=youtube;50BRLXSM1io]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50BRLXSM1io[/video]

Thanks in advance :)
 
Dec 18, 2007
1,610
14
65
Northampton, MA - USA
I'd suggest you start with Kenton Knepper's manuscript on the Duct Tape Blindfold, this is going to help you greatly improve on what you've got set here. But you might want to spend a good 6+ months just learning about blindfold work, it's not all that easy to make it convincing and too, most performers fail to distinguish whether they are working from Intuition, using Clairvoyance or Telepathy. . . because of the barrage of cynicism found in magic we've taken a "it doesn't matter" attitude which really does hurt what we do. A Telepathist cannot tell you how much change you have in a pocket unless you have first counted it; a Clairvoyant can however because that ability allows them to see things "remotely" as in, inside sealed envelopes, boxes, your pocket, etc. The Intuitionist might be able to describe the change in your pocket but they rarely are able to give an exact sum.

Couple techniques; here you are doing the thing with raising hands but it's a perfect set up for Jerome Finley's handling of the old Sinner/Saint routine known as Thought Channel (brace yourself, it's not cheap). Personally, I can see you going a very long way if you were to toss TC into this bit, it will open a ton of doorways for you.

Stop looking at the work as a "trick"! This is the biggest mistake magicians make when it comes to Mentalism. Our goal as Mentalists is to illicit belief from the patron; screw this rhetoric about the "suspension of belief", that's for stage magic. The thing that makes Mentalism unique is that regardless our cover story, we strive to make it "real". . . I don't mean esoteric or paranormal (though many do) but allowing our demonstration/presentation to have a sense of validity be it quasi-science, psychology, old wives tales & superstitions, etc. Mentalism is experiential not an observational art; it requires participation by ALL present in order to know optimum impact.

You have a good starting point but I think you need some more R&D time. One manuscript I'd suggest you track down is Eddie Joseph's "INTUITIONAL SIGHT". While the whole Bread Dough thing is great for comedy, it's messy as hell, so you may wish to ignore that part of the act and simply study the "tests" in that the whole act is based on NATURAL Human Intuition. This is the act I started with decades ago and still holds sway over how I do my work and set my claims.
 
Jan 11, 2011
156
0
Craig, thanks a lot for your input! I've not got that much experience with duct tape blindfold, and it's great to know some good resources. I'm a fan of Kenton's work, but I've not read that manuscript yet. I'll have a read as soon as I can!

With regards to Clairvoyance and Telepathy, I think my presentation would fall into completely different category. Character I try to build is supposed to do those things not through psychic skills, but through psychology. In that routine, I wanted it to look like his doing certain things because of my suggestions. But I don't know whether it came across clearly enough.

I'll make sure to check out Jerome Finley's Thought Channel and Intuitional Sight. Thanks :)
 
Dec 18, 2007
1,610
14
65
Northampton, MA - USA
You don't have to go the esoteric route, I was just pointing out how easy it is to confuse things when it comes to blindfold work but on that topic, you will need to outline what works when it comes to your more analytical approach. I don't see how you could, for an example, do coins in the pocket or similar clairvoyant bits without some serious preliminaries that would allow for some kind of quasi-logic that people would follow. Like the Telepathist there must be a "known" factor. For example, a test group can choose from 5 or 6 items to physically place into a box or draw an image of and seal it in a security envelope, etc. Then, based on psychology type logic, you are able to explain why it wouldn't be any of the unchosen object and come to your conclusion . . . very Sherlock Holmes. The blindfold aids you by robbing you of distractions; how people involved in an experiment might inadvertently give you "tells" when it comes to what's going on and the fact that you are trying to avoid such things, allowing analytical logic to guide you instead.

I think it's an approach that has serious potential though it will require a good deal of work. I'd be more than happy to challenge you along the way ;-)
 
Jan 11, 2011
156
0
Thanks again, Craig. Yes, I think I'm heading towards this Sherlock Holmes approach. I think it's very interesting what you said about this looking for 'tells'. This could make the performance much more interesting. I see there's still quite a lot to work on, with this routine, but these are some great ideas. I'm going to think about it and maybe do it one more time :)
 
Searching...
0 Results