It's your fault, not the effect's...

Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
I'm typing this up to address a disturbing attitude I've seen going around the magic community in general. I've had words with a few individuals personally, and this is the compilation of my thoughts on this matter.

Let me begin by saying very plainly I don't want to hear about how you think you figured out the method to someone else's effect by watching the trailer. I would rather listen to Louie Anderson digest a deep-fried McRib sandwich than hear you brag about your percieved intuition.

Why? Because these boasts are either followed by or carry a subtext of, "I figured it out, so the method sucks." This makes my blood boil. No matter how many times you're proven wrong, how often other magicians use the effect with great results, you just repeat the process next month with the next big releases.

For all of you would-be Hercule Poirot in-trainings out there, I have three words for you: Hindu shuffle force. This is the kind of method that you people would whine about if you caught on. You would say how disappointed everyone would be about the method and how it would fool no one. I use this force regularly. Do you know how often I've been caught? Never. Ask yourself: does that make you wrong or am I just that awesome? Loaded question, because it's both. I rule.

Some around here have tried to illustrate to you that the method is nowhere near as important as whether or not you can get the reactions. And they're absolutely right. The Hindu force is obscenely simple, but obscenely effective at the same time. But it's only a tool to get me where I want to go. There are plenty of ways to accomplish the same end.

What it all comes down to is that if you fail, it's not the fault of the method. It's yours. It's always your fault.

I had a guitar teacher at one point who toured Europe with a guitar that cost him $90. Carlos Santana has a custom-made PRS guitar that he pays over $5000 for each. And yet my teacher managed to get excellent tone out of the cheapo rig.

If that analogy was too obtuse, how about this. Copper/silver transpositions. Lots of different ways to do them. Scotch & Soda is one of the most popular as it allows you to end totally clean, and that is a nice advantage. But I personally prefer to pack as light as possible with minimal gimmicks, so I do my effect with pure sleight of hand. It's riskier, but if I get caught it's my own fault, not the method. But it does work, and the spectators still see the same end result: the impossible switch of two coins from within closed fists.

When people start learning magic, they usually feel a little discouraged to learn how simple and obvious it all really is. But with experience, you come to learn that you should be thinking less of the method and more of the performance thereof and how it will look.

However, when you begin talking about how you already figured out methods and how people are going to be disappointed to learn them, you betray yourself as either an amateur, or a bad magician.

So the next time you feel like bending our ears with your "wisdom", stop and consider whether or not any of us want to hear it, and whether you're making a colossal fool of yourself. Harsh, I know. But this all needed to be said.
 
Sep 1, 2007
1,572
2
34
Leicester, UK
www.youtube.com
I couldn't agree more, it riles me up when another magician says something like:

"I don't like that, it's too obvious"

(Now unless it is a blatantly obvious move like switching a card right in front of their eyes and telling them you didn't do anything) I have this to say:

Yeah it's obvious to you! But not to a spectator, why did you get into magic? Because you loved the feeling you got when you saw an effect, not because you thought 'Hmm I can't see how that one was done, I'll get into magic to find out'.

Whenever you watch an effect, think about it from the point of view from a magician, then rewatch it and think about it from the point of view from a spectator. Think about what they see, not what they're looking for. They want to enjoy the magic just as much as you do, and unless you've got a really awkward spectator who is just their to ruin your fun, you know exactly how to handle that situation, but for the majority of the time the spectators will just be watching you put a card into a deck and making it come to the top again. They won't - I'll say that again, won't - be watching you do a double lift or pass etc. (Unless you've done it that rubbishly in which case we come back to the title of the thread):

It's your fault, not the effect's...

My views on the matter. :)

- Sean
 
Aug 31, 2007
263
0
I mildly disagree...

When I say to a fellow magician, "That's too obvious", it's because it IS too obvious. In other words, either you flashed or something looked too suspicious to fly by even for laymen.

Let's not make laymen sound stupid and think that every trick can fly by them.

But yes, I agree that figuring something out doesn't mean the effect is bad.

- harapan. magic!
 
Sep 1, 2007
105
0
Missouri, USA
Very well put, Steerpike. In my opinion the secret behind a trick has little effect on how magical it can be. The magic comes from the performance. So long as the method can be pulled off without exposure, it is up to the performer to ensure that. It's very immature and just annoying to think highly of yourself because you know the method behind an effect. I know the methods behind tons of effects, but that doesn't mean I'm capable of presenting them all. I have nothing to brag about there.

Harapanong, I think you're disagreeing with a point that he didn't bring up. He's not saying that telling somebody they flashed or looked unnatural is wrong. He just wants to put out there that figuring out a method and thinking it will never work or is too "Bad" is just plain stupid. You're right when you say we shouldn't make laymen sound stupid, which is why a method needs to be refined before it is performed.


Peace
 
Searching...
{[{ searchResultsCount }]} Results