A quote by Chris Hestnes in the D&D forums :
Uggh... stupid Jerry's mystique...
The first thing you need to understand, is that these cards are very overhyped... Bobby seems to believe they live up to it though... I'd be curious as to whether he likes the Tahoes better, anyway...
The reason people liked Jerry's Nugget cards so much back when they were cheap as hell, like $1 a deck, is for a number of reasons. First of all, they were printed on very stiff stock, almost carta mundi stiff. Stiffness not only means that it's, well, stiff, but that it's also very durable, which means it lasts a long time. You know that period of time when you get a deck well worn in, and it's just really really nice? That period of time with a deck of stiffer cards is much longer.
Second, they were/are a very thin deck of cards. Contrary to what Ellusionist believes, thick is not better. A thinner deck is alot easier to play with, whether it be flourishes or magic. It seems like almost an oxymoron to have a thin, and very stiff deck of cards, but it was evidently possible.
Third, they had a very unique finish on them. It's nothing like the air cushion on bicycle cards, because you can't really see the dimples, they're more like aladdins in that they're smooth. The cards don't fan well at times, and have a tendency to clump up after a long use, which is bad, but the finish has it's positive points too. The cards stay very square, it's not like a bicycle deck where cards get really bent up, and if you relax your grip and look at the side of the deck, it's not really square. Jerry's stay nice and crisp.
Fourth, and most polarizing is the back design. They're a really striking blue or red almost all over. No complicated scrollwork on these, just a very plain, bold colored back. Some love it, some hate it. They show up really well on film, which is why the Buck twins decided to use them on the System... that and those are their favorite cards.
Anyway, they also have their downsides. 1) they're a ***** to break in 2) after a long session, they clump up alot and are really sticky 3) they don't fan very well until they're really good and softened up. 4) Sometimes they're almost too stiff 5) Chances are nowadays that if you pick up a deck, it'll be pretty old, so the cards will be REALLY warped, which can help you sometimes (natural breaks and the like) But **** you over at other times.
Long story short, they're really good cards, that were given a really good reputation, and were supremely hyped.
The reason they can't replicate the stock is also kind of a long issue.
1)The machinery they use to produce all their cards is different. From the way they make the paper, to the dyes they cut with, the finish has a different composition now, things like that.
If you take a look at a deck of Tally-ho's for example, and you riffle the corner, you'll notice that the back seems to move around the edge, because they're not printed on the center of the card. They used to print on a press, now they roll them by on lines.
2) The USPCC doesn't want to. As a market, magicians are a small group to begin with, there are MAYBE 45,000-50,000 magicians in the US. The US playing card company sold 120 mllion decks of cards in whatever year Steve Forte made the gaming protection series, and your average joe who goes and buys a deck of cards doens't really care about the stock. The number of magicians is small already, the number of magicians who know and care about Jerry's Nugget's is a fraction of that.
I'm sure if you really tried, like got the patent numbers of the finish and machinery the USPCC used that year, you could get Jerry's reprinted for some ridiculous price, but sell them for $20 a deck and still make a profit.
There was discussion a long time ago about the Buck twins getting their own deck printed, but it's simply too expensive, although I don't doubt for a second they'd make it all back.
Food for thought.