The biggest topic recent obviously is Prophet. I'm not here to down any trick. I'm pointing out differences that people either don't notice or think about.
Mr. Sanders has posted his underground handling video demo on his page. I don't understand how people don't see a difference. It just looks sloppy. I guess it depends on what your taste is. My standards are very high. Jerking bills up and down as in the underground demo just won't cut it for me. It looks WAY too obvious. I almost feel he gave the trick away by showing that. As a laymen I would instantly have an idea of what's going on.
I would like EB a lot more if you could leave the bills static and not jerk them up and down or side to side (as you have no choice with the underground handling). I think the strongest part of Prophet is you can hold the bills horizontal completely still and do the change lightning fast without slinging the bills up and down or towards the ground. The result is a total face change that looks like a "snap" or "window" change you see with playing cards, a change as sick as the Buck twins can do. This is one point that can't be replicated with EB.. and to me, IS the selling point with Prophet.
Now I realize that this whole paragraph is based on MY taste and opinion, they BOTH have perks. I just wanted to point out a few differences that people ' Don't think about??
It's funny, obviously Sanders JUST put that video up to defend his trick against Prophet. I think he shot himself in the foot. It further supported my opinion on how "Clean" Prophet looks compared to EB. He was bragging about "no edits, cuts or special effects" I'd hope not seeing that footage. @ a little over 2 minutes in the Prophet final trailer, you are seeing from 12" away exactly how the effect would look if your face was that close to the bills.. no edits. It looks THAT good in person.
Now Sanders Fiber Optics = sick sick sick (I'm not completely bias)
Mr. Sanders has posted his underground handling video demo on his page. I don't understand how people don't see a difference. It just looks sloppy. I guess it depends on what your taste is. My standards are very high. Jerking bills up and down as in the underground demo just won't cut it for me. It looks WAY too obvious. I almost feel he gave the trick away by showing that. As a laymen I would instantly have an idea of what's going on.
I would like EB a lot more if you could leave the bills static and not jerk them up and down or side to side (as you have no choice with the underground handling). I think the strongest part of Prophet is you can hold the bills horizontal completely still and do the change lightning fast without slinging the bills up and down or towards the ground. The result is a total face change that looks like a "snap" or "window" change you see with playing cards, a change as sick as the Buck twins can do. This is one point that can't be replicated with EB.. and to me, IS the selling point with Prophet.
Now I realize that this whole paragraph is based on MY taste and opinion, they BOTH have perks. I just wanted to point out a few differences that people ' Don't think about??
It's funny, obviously Sanders JUST put that video up to defend his trick against Prophet. I think he shot himself in the foot. It further supported my opinion on how "Clean" Prophet looks compared to EB. He was bragging about "no edits, cuts or special effects" I'd hope not seeing that footage. @ a little over 2 minutes in the Prophet final trailer, you are seeing from 12" away exactly how the effect would look if your face was that close to the bills.. no edits. It looks THAT good in person.
Now Sanders Fiber Optics = sick sick sick (I'm not completely bias)