You know how when people say that the magician levitated a foot off the ground when doing the Balducci levitation (funny how perception works)? I think you have to keep in mind some testimonials may be coming from audience members rather than people that know the secret behind the method. I'm weary of praise that may not know 100% of the effect. That's why we rely on reviews.
Well, we've already been told that the CIBs are practical, that Bullet is impromtu, and a Brad Christian post suggested that if Factory Sealed has a set-up, then it's something that can be done right in front of your audiences eyes. Then, even if most of them are from people who don't know, even you practically said that the testimonials for these CIBs are amazingly positive. Now let me ask you: If the effect is practical and accomplishable, and it looks amazing to your spectators, then what's the deal? Do you really need more? Remember, it doesn't really matter what the effect looks like from you as the magicians point of view, it matters what it looks like to common laymen who don't know the secret. It matters what it looks to your
spectators, NOT
you. So what difference does it make what the secret's like as long as it's practical/amazingly visual? You don't perform the secret, you perform the effect. And as long as the secret meets the above criteria, I'll be as happy as can be with these CIBs. Don't expect impossible magic, expect amazing illusions.
I hope that this post opened some of your eyes(yes I'm talking to all of you people who were dead excited for Indecent and now hate it because of the method). Indecent is a perfect example of the point I'm trying to prove. In my opinion, it's an amazing effect with a genius method. But most of you who don't like it don't like it because of what the effect is like from you as the magician who knows the secret's point of view. Bad, bad, bad....
I'm not trying to offend any of you that this might apply to, not at all. I'm just trying to open your eyes to the reality of the situation.