Thanks, Andrew! I'm glad to hear you found the review helpful. It makes it worth the flak it received. For a forum frequented/moderated by supposedly free-wheeling, free-minded types, there seems to be quite a bit of intolerance for divergent opinions.
As a coda to this mini-drama, I hope everyone considers the following:
The facts
I submitted my critical review with a 1-star rating to CRUSH's product page at the same time that Blindside, ECaulfield, and others submitted their positive reviews. Theirs appear on CRUSH's product page. Mine does not.
Editorializing
Ever wonder how it is that almost every product on T11 is rated at least 4 out of 5 stars and the reviews are generally glowing? Now we know. I suspect that T11 "manages" product reviews in much the same way that public corporations "manage" financial statements and earnings reports. As a business strategy, I can't criticize it: it's the profit-maximizing choice! But knowing this means I'll definitely look to sources other than the reviews on the product page before buying anything in future.
We all seem to fond of Latin here, so I'll end with this: Caveat emptor.
adr11,
I suggest that next time, you contact us in good faith before jumping to conclusions about conspiracies and dishonesty. In this case, your facts are not facts. I checked into this myself this morning.
Two things. Firstly, all ratings are calculated live on product pages. If you rate something a 1 (meaning worthless - which I feel is absurd, but you are entitled to that opinion), your rating is immediately calculated and averaged with proper mathematics into the product review. Our system is not biased to like a product. For proof, check out the rating for Static. Great trick, but 3 star rating. Crush is rated 4.5 stars because although you rated it a 1, about 249 other people rated it a 4 or 5. This skews things a bit in that direction, with good reason.
Your review, although you said was submitted - appears nowhere in our back end panel awaiting posting. We post all well written, constructive reviews written respectfully and in good faith. True, if something says "yo 4 real this sucks" - of course we will not post it as it is not intellectual, professional discourse. But if a review is written in good faith, constructive, and professional, we always post it.
As I write this, we have THREE pages full -
45 to be exact - of reviews that are awaiting moderation / approval by our team. Every single one of them is
4 or 5 stars. Why? No, not because of a censorship conspiracy, but because we produce products that are actually GOOD, and our creative team hand selects each of them in promotion of quality over quantity.
You are entitled to your opinion. You have every right to declare this effect doesn't suit your fancy - of course I respect that. There are tons of effects in magic that, while I admit are widely respected and cool in concept, just don't fit me. However, I don't think it fair or judicious to jump to erroneous conclusions and post them as facts without a good faith effort to check with us first.