The title of this thread is misleading because I don't think it's a bad thing to "cross the line" when it comes to blurring the line between magic and miracle. For example,
Stigmata - Wayne came up with a brilliant way to reveal anything on your arm. Performers know to be weary to perform for God-fearing people.
Control - Yet another brainchild of W:H. Slowing down and stopping your pulse.
Stigmata AD - tears of blood, along with another pulse stopping technique, and blood from the hand.
I'm sure there are more effects that borderline Magic and Miracle but these are the "now" ones.
I personally love effects like these. With the magic I perform, I go for shock value. A reaction is great, but a stone cold stare with a locked open jaw seems to say so much more but does anyone think its crossing a line that shouldn't be crossed?
On a (not so) similar note, Jim Caveizel (sp) plays Jesus (same initials by the way) in The Passion of the Christ. Jim was the same age (while playing Jesus) as Jesus was when he was crucified. Also, Jim was struck by lightning while filming part of the crucifixion scene. Coincidence or warning?
Anyhow, the point I'm trying to make: Are we crossing a line or should it be fine for us to toy with 'replicating' what numerous religions fear? Even if we say it's magic/an illusion, is it right? Is it wrong? Is it ok?
I'm not THAT religious in any way but this is more of an ethical question.