Jason,
If you will allow me, I will retract my initial post and clarify.
The fact that the ONLY credit was what inspired him as opposed to including other credits that record the history is what I had an issue with. The other issue was that he was told about a credit, yet he still published it.
Maybe I am wrong but it just seemed like he dimissed the other magicians trying to help him with crediting. However, your claim that I had an issue with "teaching" something that was not his is totally wrong. In no way did I mention nor hint that him "teaching" something that was not his was wrong. It was just a crediting issue.
Hope this clarifies my stance.
Best,
Trini
If you will allow me, I will retract my initial post and clarify.
The fact that the ONLY credit was what inspired him as opposed to including other credits that record the history is what I had an issue with. The other issue was that he was told about a credit, yet he still published it.
Maybe I am wrong but it just seemed like he dimissed the other magicians trying to help him with crediting. However, your claim that I had an issue with "teaching" something that was not his is totally wrong. In no way did I mention nor hint that him "teaching" something that was not his was wrong. It was just a crediting issue.
Hope this clarifies my stance.
Best,
Trini