-
Featured Tricks
NotarizedPHOENIXCandymanMagic 101Distancia -
Card Tricks
DispositionPetroleumOmegaDouble AgentLIT -
Coin Tricks
Perfect CentsMiRAGEALCHEMYCoinONETRIFECTA -
Cardistry
SpringThumb PropulsionFlickNB3Monument -
theory11 Artists
Blake Vogt Spidey Mathieu Bich Calen Morelli Jonathan Bayme Apollo Robbins Chris Kenner Dan Sperry Dan White Dimitri Arleri Ekaterina Jason England Justin Willman Luke Jermay Tom Isaacson Wayne Houchin Christen Gerhart Andy Nyman Dan & Dave Steve CohenMeet Our Artists
Torn or TnR?
- Thread starter Hunter
- Start date
I would say Torn. It's much more practical, and very visual. It may be a little harder, but it looks awesome when performed correctly.
TnR just seems so impractical to me. It looks good on camera, but it doesn't look as good up close.
So it's a big go for Torn from me!
David
TnR just seems so impractical to me. It looks good on camera, but it doesn't look as good up close.
So it's a big go for Torn from me!
David
with tnr u have to make a gimmick but the effect is so damn powerful..
torn is a very nice torn and restored card that can be signed but I think that the TnR restoring really kicks torn's restoring ass
so its ur decision a powerful impromptu torn and restored card
or an even cooler torn and restored card that changes its identity =)
torn is a very nice torn and restored card that can be signed but I think that the TnR restoring really kicks torn's restoring ass
so its ur decision a powerful impromptu torn and restored card
or an even cooler torn and restored card that changes its identity =)
TORN is a great impromptu torn and restored card, but you do need an extra thing in each performance which I hate.
In TnR you need what... 5 of the same cards to make the gimmick but that's better than needing on extra thing in every performance like in TORN. And TnR is more visual. But I'm still confused about the ripping in TnR... you can't start out ripping it, right? And also, you can not sign the front or hand it out to the spectator which for me sucks for a torn and restored card.
If I were you, you should get the FITH and FOUR by Huron Low.
In TnR you need what... 5 of the same cards to make the gimmick but that's better than needing on extra thing in every performance like in TORN. And TnR is more visual. But I'm still confused about the ripping in TnR... you can't start out ripping it, right? And also, you can not sign the front or hand it out to the spectator which for me sucks for a torn and restored card.
If I were you, you should get the FITH and FOUR by Huron Low.
yeah same here it wont cost you much more and you end up getting the most genius TNR invented. The gimmick is diabolical and is practically hidden in plain view.
Plus the restoration isn't hard and it so visual and in your face.
TORN, i have both. tnr is visual but you have to make a gimmick, in the end its not examinable the card can't really be signed, and at the end of tnr the back of the card looks like crap...
In torn its signable, its fairly impromptu, you can give it to the spectator after the trick. It is by far a much better trick!
In torn its signable, its fairly impromptu, you can give it to the spectator after the trick. It is by far a much better trick!
TORN is better layman wont know what kind of TnR's there are so torn is way better and thats the one i would get
Hey, I have performed Mathieu's TnR twice for groups. Trust me, it is practical.