Hi everyone,
First, an introduction. I have been performing and studying magic for almost seven years. I write a lot of essays and articles on magic.
Jamy Ian Swiss, a HUGE influence on myself since I saw him perform in New York, wrote an article, "In Search of Street Magic," not too long ago. This has caused controversy, but I support it for two reasons. The first being many of his thoughts were simliar or nearly identical to my own that I had before reading it, and the second being he added many great points to my array of thoughts that I had never pondered before. Jamy, as many of you know, is very opinionated, much like myself.
I would like to analyze, though, one specific part of his article. Jamy points out that being able to perform magic can be defined by many sub-elements, one being the ability to use ordinary objects to create magic. This is, even if you don't realize this, the reason magic with playing cards is so strong; playing cards are basic, ordinary objects that can be used to create so many miralces.
I know that his article openly criticizes Ellusionist and many magicians associated with it, and I support a lot of it. However, I'd like to skip to his analysis of their custom playing cards.
"'A deck never seen before'...as if this was a good thing."
100% correct. If the deck is never seen before, isn't that taking away from the value of using playing cards to begin with?
Sure, feel is important. Is the feel of a regular deck of Bikes not good enough...not worth another $8 for the "Viper" deck? I wass curious and bought one of these...feels the same to me...
The truth is, custom cards are really not meant to be used in magic. They are a marketing scheme; more noticable is actually WORSE. I read a post on the ellusionist forums saying something like (in response to a thread criticizing the use of custom playing cards):
...The Ghost Deck is good for routines that call upon the dead or anything like that...
Actually, it doesn't add anything. Again, plain is better when it comes to magic; it's the reason why stage magicians use doves...because they are plain white birds being manipulated by someone in a black suit. That means a spectator can clearly see the doves, adding an element of impossibility to the performance. If the magician was using an African-bred genetically modified bird wearing a more classy, but green suit, the audience wouldn't be concentrating on the magic because of the violation of "less is more."
So all of you people who have been subjected to excellent marketing from sellers of custom decks of cards that run for higher prices and look anything but ordinary, I don't blame you. It seems like a great thing at first, but looking deeper into magic theory, you can see why these custom "cool" decks are not only a waste of money, but a prop that could take away from your next performance.
Essaywriter out.
First, an introduction. I have been performing and studying magic for almost seven years. I write a lot of essays and articles on magic.
Jamy Ian Swiss, a HUGE influence on myself since I saw him perform in New York, wrote an article, "In Search of Street Magic," not too long ago. This has caused controversy, but I support it for two reasons. The first being many of his thoughts were simliar or nearly identical to my own that I had before reading it, and the second being he added many great points to my array of thoughts that I had never pondered before. Jamy, as many of you know, is very opinionated, much like myself.
I would like to analyze, though, one specific part of his article. Jamy points out that being able to perform magic can be defined by many sub-elements, one being the ability to use ordinary objects to create magic. This is, even if you don't realize this, the reason magic with playing cards is so strong; playing cards are basic, ordinary objects that can be used to create so many miralces.
I know that his article openly criticizes Ellusionist and many magicians associated with it, and I support a lot of it. However, I'd like to skip to his analysis of their custom playing cards.
"'A deck never seen before'...as if this was a good thing."
100% correct. If the deck is never seen before, isn't that taking away from the value of using playing cards to begin with?
Sure, feel is important. Is the feel of a regular deck of Bikes not good enough...not worth another $8 for the "Viper" deck? I wass curious and bought one of these...feels the same to me...
The truth is, custom cards are really not meant to be used in magic. They are a marketing scheme; more noticable is actually WORSE. I read a post on the ellusionist forums saying something like (in response to a thread criticizing the use of custom playing cards):
...The Ghost Deck is good for routines that call upon the dead or anything like that...
Actually, it doesn't add anything. Again, plain is better when it comes to magic; it's the reason why stage magicians use doves...because they are plain white birds being manipulated by someone in a black suit. That means a spectator can clearly see the doves, adding an element of impossibility to the performance. If the magician was using an African-bred genetically modified bird wearing a more classy, but green suit, the audience wouldn't be concentrating on the magic because of the violation of "less is more."
So all of you people who have been subjected to excellent marketing from sellers of custom decks of cards that run for higher prices and look anything but ordinary, I don't blame you. It seems like a great thing at first, but looking deeper into magic theory, you can see why these custom "cool" decks are not only a waste of money, but a prop that could take away from your next performance.
Essaywriter out.