Essay: Analyzing a Legend's Words: Jamy Ian Swiss

D

Deleted member 2755

Guest
Personally, I enjoyed the essay and all I did was post it here and now everybody criticizes me for it. Excuse me for helping. Also, for anybody that even took Essaywriter's arguments into considering and are calling Ian's essay stupid.... think again because Essaywriter's whole original essay was just based off of Ian's essay.... sorry for helping, I'll try not to stay on topic as much. My mistake.

I may not agree with every little detail... but most of his points are completely true.

-Doug
 
Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
Personally, I enjoyed the essay and all I did was post it here and now everybody criticizes me for it. Excuse me for helping.

A little defensive there.

I wasn't attacking you. I was saying that Mr. Swiss was insulting his own intelligence by writing what is effectively a hate letter to David Blaine and Brad Christian.

It's well-written, but it's bogged down by its own agenda.

I may not agree with every little detail... but most of his points are completely true.

This ought to be good. Give me some examples.
 
D

Deleted member 2755

Guest
A little defensive there.

I wasn't attacking you. I was saying that Mr. Swiss was insulting his own intelligence by writing what is effectively a hate letter to David Blaine and Brad Christian.

It's well-written, but it's bogged down by its own agenda.



This ought to be good. Give me some examples.

Well from you and the other posts, it just looked as though you were pretty much attacking me for simply giving a link... if you weren't I apologize, but that is the image I got in my mind.

I just happen to agree about the whole deal on playing cards.

"his biggest profit-stream may well be the playing cards he markets: decks with names like Viper, Ghost, and Black Tiger. These are cards with black backs, black faces, reversed colors, and other oddball variants of U.S. Playing Card pasteboards, which he markets to adolescents as "cool," but of course violate the entire raison d'etre for doing magic with playing cards in the first place."

I completely agree with this. We already talked about this earlier in the thread so I won't comment on it further.

Also... I'm not in the mood now to get into an argument... don't try to start something in here....

-Doug
 
Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
I completely agree with this. We already talked about this earlier in the thread so I won't comment on it further.

And it's my belief from experience that the people who hate custom cards and want other people to stop using them are failing to realize that it's their fault and not the deck's.

I've made my offer multiple times to give everyone my script for dispelling negative suspicions about Ghost deck, but the fact that no one has taken me up on the offer speaks volumes.

Also... I'm not in the mood now to get into an argument... don't try to start something in here....

Without dissent there is only stagnation.
 
D

Deleted member 2755

Guest
And it's my belief from experience that the people who hate custom cards and want other people to stop using them are failing to realize that it's their fault and not the deck's.

I've made my offer multiple times to give everyone my script for dispelling negative suspicions about Ghost deck, but the fact that no one has taken me up on the offer speaks volumes.



Without dissent there is only stagnation.

As I have said, I rarely ever get questioned with these decks, however, it has happened. I just feel that if people have been using cards their whole life that pretty much look the same and then someone just takes out a deck that looks crazy.... well suspicion may rise. However... again... it has rarely ever happened to me. I also have performed with custom decks many times. I used my deck of Guardians the other day actually. I just support Ian because of his reasoning.

I would also love to see how you make it so spectators don't get suspicious from your Ghost deck. (I'm meaning this normally, not in an angry way. I'm actually interested.)

-Doug
 
Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
I would also love to see how you make it so spectators don't get suspicious from your Ghost deck. (I'm meaning this normally, not in an angry way. I'm actually interested.)

That means you're the only person supporting Swiss who actually wants to hear a conflicting opinion.

People kept saying that using a Ghost deck is stupid because people will think it's a trick deck. So I combined a little of my humor with some Kenton Knepper-esque suggestion, and some conventional wisdom on props.

I don't open with cards, but when I do take them out, I say the following:

"The first thing you'll notice is that these cards are a little unusual in that they're black and white. I personally like that because I'm just pretentious that way. But they also feel really slick too. Here, take a look (hand them the deck). Vegas quality stock and finish."

Here's what I'm doing.

1. I immediately call attention to the unusual look of the deck, but not in a way like I'm trying to be cool. I'm commenting from their point of view. Black and white cards are unusual.
2. I dismiss the look of the cards as me being pretentious. For me, this works as a lot of my scripting revolves around a dry wit with a wry sense of self-awareness.
3. I brag about the feel of the deck and let them handle it to see for themselves.
4. I plant the mental image of Las Vegas.

What does this accomplish? Well, first of all by calling attention to the unusual aspect of the cards, I make it seem as if there's nothing to hide. I'm fairly low-key and casual about it so that it doesn't look like I'm being defensive. Rather than addressing the deck as if I've been accused of something, I say it like it's something they just noticed and I'm agreeing with them.

Again, this makes it seem as if there's nothing to hide.

By dismissing the look as pretentious, it makes people laugh. Laughter disarms people. It also subtly suggests that I only picked up the deck for looks (which isn't too far from the truth).

Then I hand them the deck. But not with, "Is this a normal deck?" tone. No, I'm bragging about the quality of the deck and letting them see for themselves. Now, Ghosts do have great stock and finish, but here's the thing. I learned from experience that most decks people keep at home are in mediocre shape at best. They don't take proper care of their cards because they're not aware such a thing exists. Since I treat my cards well, they always seem so clean and smooth. People chalk this up to the pure quality of the cards because I said so.

Even in cases where I perform for card sharks, it still works because they're used to handling cards and can appreciate the differences in stock and finish almost as well as magicians.

And of course since they handled the deck they have the chance to see that there are no markings or wierd marks, cuts, or apparatus. They won't find any.

So now they think I bought the decks for looks and because they're higher quality, which is something you naturally assume a professional would do.

Now they're thinking the deck is made to look fancy and built smooth and sturdy so professionals can use it.

Finally, I plant the image of Vegas in their minds. Vegas is synonymous with ostentation and pretense, tying back to my earlier statement making fun of myself. Vegas is also synonymous with casinos and professional gamblers and card sharks which ties back to my bragging about the quality of the deck.

Ever since I started using this scripting, I've never had a problem with people thinking the deck is gimmicked.
 
That means you're the only person supporting Swiss who actually wants to hear a conflicting opinion.

People kept saying that using a Ghost deck is stupid because people will think it's a trick deck. So I combined a little of my humor with some Kenton Knepper-esque suggestion, and some conventional wisdom on props.

I don't open with cards, but when I do take them out, I say the following:

"The first thing you'll notice is that these cards are a little unusual in that they're black and white. I personally like that because I'm just pretentious that way. But they also feel really slick too. Here, take a look (hand them the deck). Vegas quality stock and finish."

Here's what I'm doing.

1. I immediately call attention to the unusual look of the deck, but not in a way like I'm trying to be cool. I'm commenting from their point of view. Black and white cards are unusual.
2. I dismiss the look of the cards as me being pretentious. For me, this works as a lot of my scripting revolves around a dry wit with a wry sense of self-awareness.
3. I brag about the feel of the deck and let them handle it to see for themselves.
4. I plant the mental image of Las Vegas.

What does this accomplish? Well, first of all by calling attention to the unusual aspect of the cards, I make it seem as if there's nothing to hide. I'm fairly low-key and casual about it so that it doesn't look like I'm being defensive. Rather than addressing the deck as if I've been accused of something, I say it like it's something they just noticed and I'm agreeing with them.

Again, this makes it seem as if there's nothing to hide.

By dismissing the look as pretentious, it makes people laugh. Laughter disarms people. It also subtly suggests that I only picked up the deck for looks (which isn't too far from the truth).

Then I hand them the deck. But not with, "Is this a normal deck?" tone. No, I'm bragging about the quality of the deck and letting them see for themselves. Now, Ghosts do have great stock and finish, but here's the thing. I learned from experience that most decks people keep at home are in mediocre shape at best. They don't take proper care of their cards because they're not aware such a thing exists. Since I treat my cards well, they always seem so clean and smooth. People chalk this up to the pure quality of the cards because I said so.

Even in cases where I perform for card sharks, it still works because they're used to handling cards and can appreciate the differences in stock and finish almost as well as magicians.

And of course since they handled the deck they have the chance to see that there are no markings or wierd marks, cuts, or apparatus. They won't find any.

So now they think I bought the decks for looks and because they're higher quality, which is something you naturally assume a professional would do.

Now they're thinking the deck is made to look fancy and built smooth and sturdy so professionals can use it.

Finally, I plant the image of Vegas in their minds. Vegas is synonymous with ostentation and pretense, tying back to my earlier statement making fun of myself. Vegas is also synonymous with casinos and professional gamblers and card sharks which ties back to my bragging about the quality of the deck.

Ever since I started using this scripting, I've never had a problem with people thinking the deck is gimmicked.

That is a very clever idea.
 
D

Deleted member 2755

Guest
That is pretty clever and good thinking as far as scripts go.

-Doug
 
Feb 23, 2008
10
0
If you can dig those points out of all the bogus strawman arguments, gross misrepresentations of facts, and thinly veiled attacks.

Back on the topic, I once again extend my offer. I have a scripting for my Ghost deck that has neutralized all suspicion so far. If you would like to hear it, I'll present it here and my reasoning behind it.

Steerpike, you have misunderstood something huge that's turned this whole argument upside down.

My biggest point is not suspicionl; it's the idea of magic with playing cards like these in general. Of course, I would have to add points about the trendy, off-course ideas of "street" magic...so I'll hold back and save that for another article...

Custom cards do not add ANYTHING to a performance. The idea of performing with them is just one of those new marketing schemes; cards are meant to be a constant variable in magic. That was the reason playing cards were used in magic from the start; they are CHEAP, ORDINARY, NOT FANCY LOOKING, AND HAVE MANY ELEMENTS THAT MAKE THEM UP (fronts, backs, color, suit, design, picture, number, etc.) THAT ALLOW CERTAIN POSSIBILITIES WHEN CREATING A CONCEPT.

Playing cards regarding magic of course are not meant to be fancy. This is merely a way for businesses like Ellusionist and even, respectfully, Theory11 to make moolah. Many of the best card magicians use regular decks of cards, and are still able to perform the craziest sleights. Using such custom cards is like practicing with a doughnut on a bat in baseball; it costs more to have there in the first place and sticks out like a sore thumb. Plus, if you get used to the feel of such custom made cards, that takes the skill out of using harder sleights, so you will never be able to just pick up a regular deck of cards and perform sleights. If the feel matters to you that much, switch from your plastic cards to Bikes. They feel FINE, and I can perform any sleight in the book with any deck just as well as Bikes.

These decks are unnecessary, cost too much money, CAN spoil a performance, add nothing to your performance, are not "cool" just because of looks (if someone just cares about the design so much, that means they care more about that than your magic, so your magic is obviously weak), and once again contradict the reasons for why we magicians use playing cards in the first place.

If you have a script to introduce Ghost cards, that's great. It doesn't add anything at all-I have, as I think I may have stated, experimented by performing an Ace Assembly that I normally perform to music with one of those expensive Ellusionist decks (The Viper, I think). Based on the audience's feedback (I hate the word 'reactions' and the phrase '...good because of good reactions'), the deck actually didn't add a thing to the performance itself.

Custom cards are marketed in such a way that they seem so "cool" to have. Magic has been plain and simple for so many years, and the magicians that keep it plain and simple are still regarded as some of the best. Juan Tamariz performs with a deck you can find for like a dollar in a drug store, and he is the best card magician I have ever seen. What does that say?
 
Feb 23, 2008
10
0
A little defensive there.

I wasn't attacking you. I was saying that Mr. Swiss was insulting his own intelligence by writing what is effectively a hate letter to David Blaine and Brad Christian.

It's well-written, but it's bogged down by its own agenda.



This ought to be good. Give me some examples.


Hate letter? He backed himself up with tons of research, analysis, and carefully thought out points that stand oh-so-true.

Example: "Brad Christian has made his living performing phenomonal street magic on the streets of New York." Uh, no he hasn't. He's made a living marketing videos like "How to do STREET MAGIC," which teach routines that can be found in children's books...yet he sells it for $60. Street magic? I've never seen even a real street magician (or busker) perform Fetcher's Aces (which the video calls "Sick Aces" probably to stop curious buyers of the video from Google searching the name "Fetcher's Aces" only to find that it can be bought along with many of the effects taught on the overpriced DVD for a whole lot cheaper taught by the actual creator in many cases [Out of this World, for example]), simply because it is a closeup routine.

The Ninja video? He can't perform a pass for his life. Another great part:

"Hence, when Christian exhibits his unfortunate attempts at doing [the pass], his ability to gaze confidently into the camera with an expression of self-satisfied mastery is apparently enough to convince his inexperienced viewers and hungry consumers that they have seen something skillful."

Because many of the hungry learners who now call themselves magicians only have seen Brad Christian "perform" a sleight like the pass, they judge by those standards. So, a "trick" that is as simple, lame, lacking, and incomplete as the "Vegas Card Cheating Routine (Ninja" is, by inexperience's standards, a top-notch form of conjuring.

Same thing with these custom cards:

Because they look so "cool" and "dark (not literally)" (many of the young Criss-Angel worshipers and wannabes who are now the new generations of magicians are just social rejects who turn into weird-ass goths and furthermorer, "street" magicians), these cards are taken in as the standard of "highs" in props for card magic, when really they are the "lows" or as Jamy put it, "...A step backwards [in the evolution of magic.]"
 

TomIsaacson

theory11 artist
Steerpike's approach is a perfect example of how you can easily kill suspicions about the cards before they even become arise. If your image as a performer is aiming to be "cool and hip" then why is it so hard to believe that you would have "cool cards" with you?

The THEORY is about using NORMAL objects, and a DECK OF CARDS, is NORMAL to most people. Most people don't consider themselves to be playing card "aficionado's" so I believe its flawed thinking that they will automatically assume they are trick cards if they haven't seen them before. SOME MIGHT, but there are plenty of ways (as steerpike described) to deal with this, and again your performance shouldn't RISE or fall on the idea that the card MIGHT be "Tricked"

Like I said mentioned in an earlier post, I was curious myself about this because it does make sense "In theory" however, once a theory is formulated it must be tested. In my instance, it hasn't proven to be a problem. All I can say is to give it a try, you will never know until you do. Or continue to use "Normal" cards, there's nothing wrong with that, but don't be scared off because is simple-minded theories propagated by those who haven't tested them.

I use the Guardians all the and if anything people compliment them. They are INTRIGUED by them... and it fits with my performance style.

As far as the article, Mr. Swiss's makes many irrelevant points and unfocused hatred toward the youth of magic. While, I agree that there needs to be a refocused appreciation and respect for the creator's and the history of the art, he seems to blame at the kids, when they DON'T KNOW any better. If he had the chance to help or guide the "youth" of magic, I doubt he would, because the article makes it very clear that he has no desire to help improve magic by educating the youth. He, instead takes pride in being a self proclaimed "Elitist" who somehow has become this "Ultimate Authority" on magic.

I do find it ironic, that he made a point to criticize teenagers doing "The Pass" and then putting it on youtube- meanwhile if you watch Jamy's performance on the Today show from 2001, it was LESS than impressive. Performing (and abusing a classic color change) multiple times (for no reason other than to seemingly "show off"), and then using the pass as a color change, in addition "flashing the packet" for the few million people that were watching at home. When given a chance to show his skill on a national platform, you could tell Matt Lauer had to "pretend" to be impressed with what he saw. Pretty sad that some consider him a "Legend" when in reality its nothing more than a myth.
 
Feb 23, 2008
10
0
Steerpike's approach is a perfect example of how you can easily kill suspicions about the cards before they even become arise. If your image as a performer is aiming to be "cool and hip" then why is it so hard to believe that you would have "cool cards" with you?

The THEORY is about using NORMAL objects, and a DECK OF CARDS, is NORMAL to most people. Most people don't consider themselves to be playing card "aficionado's" so I believe its flawed thinking that they will automatically assume they are trick cards if they haven't seen them before. SOME MIGHT, but there are plenty of ways (as steerpike described) to deal with this, and again your performance shouldn't RISE or fall on the idea that the card MIGHT be "Tricked"

Like I said mentioned in an earlier post, I was curious myself about this because it does make sense "In theory" however, once a theory is formulated it must be tested. In my instance, it hasn't proven to be a problem. All I can say is to give it a try, you will never know until you do. Or continue to use "Normal" cards, there's nothing wrong with that, but don't be scared off because is simple-minded theories propagated by those who haven't tested them.
I use the Guardians all the and if anything people compliment them. They are INTRIGUED by them... and it fits with my performance style.

As far as the article, Mr. Swiss's makes many irrelevant points and unfocused hatred toward the youth of magic. While, I agree that there needs to be a refocused appreciation and respect for the creator's and the history of the art, he seems to blame at the kids, when they DON'T KNOW any better. If he had the chance to help or guide the "youth" of magic, I doubt he would, because the article makes it very clear that he has no desire to help improve magic by educating the youth. He, instead takes pride in being a self proclaimed "Elitist" who somehow has become this "Ultimate Authority" on magic.

I do find it ironic, that he made a point to criticize teenagers doing "The Pass" and then putting it on youtube- meanwhile if you watch Jamy's performance on the Today show from 2001, it was LESS than impressive. Performing (and abusing a classic color change) multiple times (for no reason other than to seemingly "show off"), and then using THE PASS as a COLOR CHANGE (WHO DOES THAT?), in addition "Flashing the packet" for the few million people that were watching at home. When given a chance to show his skill on a national platform, you could tell Matt Lauer had to "pretend" to be impressed with what he saw. Pretty sad that some consider him a "Legend" when in reality its nothing more than a myth.

...And Oprah had to pretend to be impressed with Criss Angel. Seriously. But he is Criss Angel...

And, I think you again have misunderstood Swiss...he says that the youth is in bad shape now, but that is the fault of the lack of influence and resources that they have had due to such marketing schemes.

Books vs. DVDs comes into play there as well...

Again, Tom, suspicion is NOT the main issue. Looks don't always add up to suspicion...
 
Sep 1, 2007
1,572
2
34
Leicester, UK
www.youtube.com
(if someone just cares about the design so much, that means they care more about that than your magic, so your magic is obviously weak)

Wow... That's possibly the most uninformed thing I've ever read. No offense buddy, I have a friend who absolutely loves Art, it is his passion and he's incredibly talented at it - I've shown him a few of my decks (Please note, I don't buy any fancy ones anymore because the shipping for me is a bit much) and he loves the artwork on them. I'm sure he'd love to look at the artwork more than my magic but if you asked him I don't think he'd say my magic is weak.

If that's your opinion then fine, but please don't try and slip it in as fact by using wording such as "that means" and "so... obviously".

Being as you like extreme examples, I'll give you one.

In school, you could have the best piece of art coursework the world has ever seen, it's got all the right details and research information in it 100%. The trouble is you've done it too nicely and the drawings/paintings are gallery quality,; the whole thing is aesthetically pleasing. If someone wants to look at that more than the information then it makes the coursework weak? Sorry but I don't buy that.

Slightly different and a bit of an extreme example but hey-ho, that seems to be what you like. Some people just enjoy art more than anything in the world, doesn't necessarily make your magic weak at all.

- Sean
 
Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
Custom cards do not add ANYTHING to a performance.

Exactly. You have to be the one to do it!

ALLOW CERTAIN POSSIBILITIES WHEN CREATING A CONCEPT.

And custom cards don't present certain possiblities when creating a concept?

CAN spoil a performance,

If they do it's your fault.

add nothing to your performance,

You're not very creative if you can't think of ways that you or someone else could use them.

If you have a script to introduce Ghost cards, that's great. It doesn't add anything at all

So it's great, and it's not. Okay then.

Question: Have you ever seen me perform?

the deck actually didn't add a thing to the performance itself.

Because I'm willing to bet you didn't do anything to take advantage of the uniqueness of the cards.

This is an issue of style. What looks good on me does not look good on you, and vice versa.

Juan Tamariz performs with a deck you can find for like a dollar in a drug store, and he is the best card magician I have ever seen. What does that say?

That it's the performer and not the prop. The way you phrased that, it sounds like Juan is great because he uses Bikes he bought at the 7-11.

Hate letter? He backed himself up with tons of research, analysis, and carefully thought out points that stand oh-so-true.

The ability to name the creator of an effect does not mean you have a point.

The Ninja video? He can't perform a pass for his life. Another great part:

"Hence, when Christian exhibits his unfortunate attempts at doing [the pass], his ability to gaze confidently into the camera with an expression of self-satisfied mastery is apparently enough to convince his inexperienced viewers and hungry consumers that they have seen something skillful."

True story. I showed my parents videos of Brad's performances. They liked them.

Not long afterward, I got into a private argument with another magician who kept slagging Brad off. I pointed out what my parents thought, hoping to make the point that there's no accounting for taste.

This magician instead came back with, "What would they know? They're not magicians."

I was stunned. It was at that point I came to understand just how much disdain the average magician has for his audience.

That's what Swiss is effectively saying. Is that what you're saying?

(Ninja" is, by inexperience's standards, a top-notch form of conjuring.

I guess you are.

(many of the young Criss-Angel worshipers and wannabes who are now the new generations of magicians are just social rejects who turn into weird-ass goths and furthermorer, "street" magicians)

In other words, me. Classy.
 
Feb 23, 2008
10
0
Wow... That's possibly the most uninformed thing I've ever read. No offense buddy, I have a friend who absolutely loves Art, it is his passion and he's incredibly talented at it - I've shown him a few of my decks (Please note, I don't buy any fancy ones anymore because the shipping for me is a bit much) and he loves the artwork on them. I'm sure he'd love to look at the artwork more than my magic but if you asked him I don't think he'd say my magic is weak.

If that's your opinion then fine, but please don't try and slip it in as fact by using wording such as "that means" and "so... obviously".

Being as you like extreme examples, I'll give you one.

In school, you could have the best piece of art coursework the world has ever seen, it's got all the right details and research information in it 100%. The trouble is you've done it too nicely and the drawings/paintings are gallery quality,; the whole thing is aesthetically pleasing. If someone wants to look at that more than the information then it makes the coursework weak? Sorry but I don't buy that.

Slightly different and a bit of an extreme example but hey-ho, that seems to be what you like. Some people just enjoy art more than anything in the world, doesn't necessarily make your magic weak at all.

- Sean

I know...that one came out wrong...I agree 100%...I think that was a half-assed thought that I never finished and it turned into something I can disagree with...thank for pointing that out.
 

TomIsaacson

theory11 artist
...And Oprah had to pretend to be impressed with Criss Angel. Seriously. But he is Criss Angel...

And, I think you again have misunderstood Swiss...he says that the youth is in bad shape now, but that is the fault of the lack of influence and resources that they have had due to such marketing schemes.

Books vs. DVDs comes into play there as well...

Again, Tom, suspicion is NOT the main issue. Looks don't always add up to suspicion...


Oprah always loves magic, even if it is Criss Angel. This was about Jamy preaching about something when he's in no place to do so. And as MUCH as I can't stand Criss Angel, the fact that he is IN the news only helps to make magic more relevant on a day to day basis. That is probably the only positive things that could be said about him.

My point is that he has NO DESIRE to HELP the youth of magic, even if he could, or was presented with an opportunity to do so, he wouldn't. He only cares about himself and writing articles that degrade others.

I realize he's coming from a different generation. Magic is obviously evolving with the culture, and the internet has increased its popularity exponentially. Magic is not the DYING ART that it used to be, its ALIVE more than ever and is seeing renewed interest in our culture. I definitely think there can be some improvements and education to the youth of magic, which is a main reason why I'm a part of Theory11, because I see this as a viable platform to help and guide those who are learning and share my experience with them. It's out of a desire to MAKE a DIFFERENCE, and if people in his position had that goal in Mind we could all raise the level of magic beyond anything we have imagined.
 
Sep 1, 2007
3,786
15
And, I think you again have misunderstood Swiss...he says that the youth is in bad shape now, but that is the fault of the lack of influence and resources that they have had due to such marketing schemes.

He loves to point fingers, but offers no real solution.

I can't stand people like that. For Swiss, it is easier to demonize a small handful of magicians than to affect positive change in hundreds more. To put it better:

My point is that he has NO DESIRE to HELP the youth of magic, even if he could, or was presented with an opportunity to do so, he wouldn't. He only cares about himself and writing articles that degrade others.

I'm siding with Tom on this. Everybody has an inner demon that tells us to find enemies and destroy them. Some of us just have a better handle on that demon than others.
 
Feb 17, 2008
33
0
K-W, ON, Canada
(if someone just cares about the design so much, that means they care more about that than your magic, so your magic is obviously weak)

These decks are unnecessary.....CAN spoil a performance...

If a pretty design on the back of a deck of cards can "ruin a performance," then your magic is obviously weak.

When a performance is spoiled, it is ALWAYS the performers fault... whether from flashing, being unprepared, poor audience management, etc. And that includes if it's spoiled by suspicion; as Steerpike has shown, even that can be controlled by the performer.

This is an issue of style. What looks good on me does not look good on you, and vice versa.

Exactly. That is the only argument he has--that they're (most often) just "for looks." It's a style choice. But do people not dress a certain way when they perform? A way that suits their performance style? Do they not act a certain way when performing? And why the crap does he care so much if people want to spend a few extra bucks on a deck of cards because they like the way they look? Hory. Clap.
Until he stops spending his money on superfluous things and lives off bread and milk... ahem ahem. Did you really need that jacuzzi? Did you really?
 
Searching...
{[{ searchResultsCount }]} Results