I would love to know about the notion of "magic is dead, without the magician".
In your group's opinion ( no offense to other members, I'm not intrested in hearing other's point of view on this): What makes a good magician?, And are the magicians you're referring to, the one who have "no rights to call themselves magicians" are that common? Do they exist among the formations of serious ameatures and keen profesionals ( in other words, serious students of the art)? If the answer is yes, then where do you see the problem, in other words, why do you think this happened?
I read alot of posts throughout the years, that "magic is dead", from many magicians especially the young age, and all of them are hobbyiests who think they have the theory, and all other oldie magicians are inferior ( not to stereotype, but you get the idea ). When it comes to performance, you find that 99% of them completely lack performing skill, and 1% having below average performing skill. Adding to the problem, they don't have enough knowledge to come with that conclusion, as they have not studied the works of magicians who are known for their skill ( Vernon, Marlo, Ortiz ..... etc ). In other words, they talk big theory, seem over-zelous about everything, brag about things they've done making mountains out of aunt holes, but in real magical applications of moves and effects, They suck real bad.
Fortunatly, this kind of people is very easy to recoginize, which is why myself and many magicians know when to discuss, and when to ignore.
I'm not saying Mr.Madison and others are like this, which is why I'm intrested in your group's opinion on the subject. I'm sure the opinion will be educated and informative.
Cheers,