Really? I said "You're taking what I said out of context to make a weak argument. When I said I was giving Miika the benefit of the doubt, I was referring to the stooges" but I forgot to say I NEVER said I was giving him the benefit of the doubt when it came to him doing the Berglas Effect. You said "you may give him the benefit of the doubt on him not using stooges, but you definitely against him when it comes to him doing the Berglas effect.". I NEVER said I was giving him the benefit of the doubt about that! You took what I said about giving him the benefit of the doubt (referring to stooges) and said I wasn't giving him the benefit of the doubt on the Berglas Effect. Again, I never said I was giving him the benefit of the doubt about that issue. Because again, I highly highly doubt Miika can accomplish what took David Berglas years upon years to hone and perfect.
You made an argument about something I never said.
Anyway, arguing on the internet is silly, so I'm gonna stop (other wise we'll keep posting back and forth to each other and that's pointless). Anyway, don't leave thinking I'm an idiot (you probably will), because I'm leaving not thinking that about you. When you look at the big picture, this is just a silly argument that's not even a big deal.
Cheers,
Ryan